830 So. 2d 328 - Sharp v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The mere mixing of separate funds and community funds in a bank account does not alone convert the entire account into community property. However, when separate funds are commingled with community funds indiscriminately so that the separate funds cannot be identified or differentiated from the community funds” all the funds are characterized as community. Biondo v. Blondo, p. 11 99-0890 (La.App. Cir. 7/31/00), 769 So.2d 94 , 103 citing Curtis v. Curtis, 403 So.2d 56, 59 (La.1981).”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 946 So. 2d 700 - Succession of Moore · 960 So. 2d 378 - Glass v. Glass

2. “[t]he standard of proving that an asset is separate is strict, clear, positive and legally certain.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Webb v. Webb