830 So. 2d 344 - State v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2006
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 450 So. 2d 621 - State v. Jackson · 420 So. 2d 1116 - State v. Williams · 421 So. 2d 880 - State v. Hooks · State v. Washington · 736 So. 2d 273 - State v. Guillard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court did not err by allowing argument and instruction concerning the sentencing range without regard to a multiple bill. As the Louisiana Supreme court found in Jackson [2] , the choice to permit an argument about the penalty is within the discretion of the trial judge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The law gives the court the right to impose a fine or probation or a jail sentence of not more than thirty months.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.