830 So. 2d 45 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Bell v. Wolfish · Payton v. New York · Hudson v. Palmer · Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Rule 4.1, Ala.R.Crim.P., and § 15-10-3 (a)(3), Ala. Code 1975, provide that a police officer may arrest a person without a warrant when the officer has probable cause to believe that the person arrested committed a felony. `Reasonable cause,' as set out in § 15-10-3 (a)(3), is equated with `probable cause.' See Smith v. State , 727 So.2d 147 (Ala.Crim.App. 1998), aff'd, 727 So.2d 173 (Ala. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 833 120 S.Ct. 91 , 145 L.Ed.2d 77 (1999)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[s]ection 13A-4-5 (b)(3) merges the inchoate offense into the conviction for the substantive offense to the extent that it bans a double conviction for both the substantive offense and a conspiracy to commit that offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.