830 So. 2d 591 - Evans v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 627 So. 2d 802 - Hutto v. Kneipp · 575 So. 2d 942 - Crockett v. Crockett · Norred v. Norred · 621 So. 2d 120 - Mayo v. Crazovich · 591 So. 2d 396 - Norred v. Norred
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) The court may also consider as income the benefits a party derives from expense-sharing or other sources; however, in determining the benefits of expense-sharing, the court shall not consider the income of another spouse, regardless of the legal regime under which the remarriage exists, except to the extent that such income is used directly to reduce the cost of a party's actual expenses. (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.