Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. State · 771 So. 2d 883 - Spann v. State · Quick v. State · 751 So. 2d 1038 - Richmond v. State · 727 So. 2d 761 - Burrell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the jury instruction simply removed language that was unnecessary to prove the offense charged in the indictment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pittman v. State“it is not error for jury instructions to reflect a constructive amendment to an indictment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pittman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.