White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 20, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-11-20

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2016

11 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“[i]n the absence of a dispositive motion or a stipulation by the parties to that effect, we must dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 917 So. 2d 404 - Maxwell v. State

Relies on 376 So. 2d 382 - Brown v. State · 492 So. 2d 1166 - Weber v. State · Willis v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-11-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1White appeals from the denial of a motion to suppress his confession. Although White entered a nolo plea specifically reserving his right to appeal, the motion is not dispositive. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140 (b) (2) (A) (i) (2000); Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla.1979); Weber v. State, 492 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Werner v. State, 828 So.2d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). In the absence of a dispositive motion or a stipulation by the parties to that effect, we must dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Weber, 492 So.2d at 1167.

¶2DISMISSED.

KLEIN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.