Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

830 So. 2d 965

Wood v. Steen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 25, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-11-25

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2014

2 state decisions

Relies on 652 So. 2d 962 - Foley v. Fleet · 390 So. 2d 464 - Travelers Indem. Co. v. Morris · Alston v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-11-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellants appeal an Order Adjudicating and Awarding Attorneys’ Fees and Costs arising out of discovery violations. Prior to this appeal, Appellant invoked the jurisdiction of this court by filing a petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of an Order on Discovery Dispute and Sanctions. This court denied the petition. Wood v. Steen, 799 So.2d 366 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

¶2In the order on appeal, the trial court awarded as sanctions against Appellants fees incurred by Appellees’ attorneys in defending the petition for writ of certiora-ri. However, Appellees did not file a motion for appellate attorney’s fees pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(b) in the certiorari case. Trial courts have no authority to award prevailing party attorney’s fees for an appeal unless specifically authorized to do so by the appellate court. Foley v. Fleet, 652 So.2d 962 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Travelers Indem. Co. of America v. Morris, 390 So.2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). We therefore reverse the order awarding fees and costs and remand to the trial court to award such appropriate sanctions, if any, excluding attorney’s fees incurred in defending the petition for writ of certiorari.

¶3The remaining issues raised on appeal are without merit.

¶4AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with instructions.

ERVIN, BOOTH and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
/830/so2d/965 · .json · Public domain