Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 830 SW2D 540 - Allen v. J.P.

Allen v. J.P.’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2000
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Interest of MEW · In Interest of MLK · Eichelberger v. Barnes Hospital · In Interest of RHS · Juvenile Officer v. L.B.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On review, we will affirm the circuit court's judgment unless it is not supported by substantial evidence, it is against the weight of the evidence, or it erroneously declares or applies the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re SLN
  2. “`When the trial court has received conflicting evidence, appellate courts should review the facts in a light most favorable to the trial court's order.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re SLN
  3. “`[c]lear, cogent and convincing evidence' does not imply the absence of conflicting evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re SLN

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.