Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 830 SW2D 584 - Riley v. State

Riley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2018

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

110199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Almanza v. State · Luck v. State · Manning v. State · Williams v. State · Morris v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the accused intentionally made a false response to Officer Payne’s[ 9 ] question, “Have you ever been in trouble[J” ... Now therefore, bearing in mind the foregoing instruction, if you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused’s response to the question, “Have you ever been in trouble[,]” was an intentional attempt by the accused to mislead the officer as to her prior criminal record so as to raise a reasonable suspicion of contraband being in the accused’s vehicle, then you may consider the evidence obtained by the search of accused’s vehicle.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Any error in the charge, over timely objection in the trial court, requires reversal if such error is “calculated to injure the rights of the defendant,” which means no more than that there must be some harm to the accused from the error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is an affirmative defense to prosecution that, at the time of the conduct charged, the actor, as a result of severe mental disease or defect, did not know that his conduct was wrong.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.