Ramirez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Drew v. State · Jones v. State · Ramirez v. State · Etter v. State · Dedesma v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The newly discovered evidence was unknown to the movant at the time of his trial; (2) the movant’s failure to discover the evidence was not due to his want of diligence; (3) the materiality of the evidence is such as would probably bring about different result in another trial; and (4) the evidence is admissible and not merely cumulative, corroborative, collateral or impeaching.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davenport“in the discretion of the court, if probative of truthfulness or untruthfulness, be inquired into on cross-examination of the witness ... concerning the witness' character for truthfulness or untruthfulness....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lopez v. State“for the purpose of attacking ... his credibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lopez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.