Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 831 F.2d 1033 - Tillotson, Ltd. v. Walbro Corp.

Tillotson, Ltd. v. Walbro Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

831 F.2d 1033 · 1987

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
July 2015
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 10 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. (1995), Quantum Corporation v. Rodime Plc (1995)

10 federal appellate · 10 district ·

2701987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 251 · 35 U.S.C. § 282

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Marathon Oil Co. v. United States · Autogiro Co. of America v. United States · Hybritech Inc. v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a claim of a reissue application is broader in scope than the original claims if it contains within its scope any conceivable apparatus or process which would not have infringed the original patent ... A claim that is broader in any respect is considered to be broader than the original claims even though it may be narrower in other respects.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A claim that is broader in any respect is considered to be broader than the original claims even though it may be narrower in other respects.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.