Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

831 F.2d 1058

Docket No. 87-7235.

Walker v. State H

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted July 30, 1987. Decided Oct. 22, 1987.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-10-22

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 1987

17 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1987-10-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Maurice Walker, appellant pro se.

Lacy H. Thornburg, Office of the Attorney General, for Appellee State of North Carolina, William McBlief, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Rickey L. Moorefield, Alamance County Attorney, for appellees County of Alamance and Stockard.

Before MURNAGHAN, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Walker v. State of North Carolina, C/A No. 86-133-G (M.D.N.C., June 4, 1987).

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/831/f2d/1058 · .json · Public domain