Local Union No. 25, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
831 F.2d 1149 · 1987
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2015
15 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades Council · National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board · Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board · Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] union has a right to press a recalcitrant employer within the limits of the law; but, [a secondary business] has an equal and correlative right to be protected from becoming a union pawn in an end game directed at some other employer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is not necessary that the only object of the [union's] actions be a secondary one; so long as an object is to pressure a neutral employer, the violation is complete.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is pragmatic in its application, looking to the coercive nature of the conduct, not to the label which it bears.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.