Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 831 F.2d 1430 - Gary H. v. Hegstrom

Gary H. v. Hegstrom’s Empirical Analysis

831 F.2d 1430 · 1987

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Company (1992), Jones v. Blanas (2004)

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

23019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Singleton v. Wulff · Whitley v. Albers · Rhodes v. Chapman · Ingraham v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he more protective fourteenth amendment standard applies to conditions of confinement when detainees ... have not been convicted [of a crime.]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Where ... an institution is noncriminal and nonpenal, allegations of unconstitutional conditions of confinement are governed by the more protective standard of the Fourteenth Amendment, rather than the Eighth Amendment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “against which courts evaluate the constitutionality of ... conditions certainly provide greater protection for juveniles than for adults.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.