Hallstrom v. Tillamook County’s Empirical Analysis
831 F.2d 889 · 1987
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2024
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 6901 (Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992) · 42 U.S.C. § 6972
Relies on Bullock v. United States · General Public Utilities Corporation v. Susquehanna Valley Alliance · Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Train · Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Callaway · Susquehanna Valley Alliance v. Three Mile Island Nuclear Reactor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The plain language of § 6972(b) [RCRA § 7002(b)] commands sixty days’ notice before commencement of the suit. To accept anything less ‘constitutes, in effect, judicial amendment in abrogation of explicit, unconditional statutory language.’ ... The notice requirement is not a technical wrinkle or superfluous formality that federal courts may waive at will.... [I]t is part of the jurisdictional conferral from Congress that cannot be altered by the courts.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.