Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 831 F.2d 944 - Kent J. Romine v. Bruce M. Parman

Kent J. Romine v. Bruce M. Parman’s Empirical Analysis

831 F.2d 944 · 1987

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably Hancock v. Dodson (1992), Barron v. Ford Motor Co. of Canada Ltd. (1992)

13 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

2001987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holmes v. United States · Cochran v. United States · Robnett v. United States · K-B Trucking Company v. Riss International Corporation · Moe v. Avions Marcel Dassault-Breguet Aviation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the exclusion of relevant evidence under Rule 403 is an extraordinary remedy to be used sparingly. The decision to exclude (or admit) evidence under this rule is within the sound discretion of the trial court, and will not be reversed by this court absent a clear abuse of discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The admissibility of evidence in diversity cases in federal court is generally governed by federal law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.