State v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2026
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hulsey v. Arkansas · State v. Pierre · Carter v. Utah Power & Light Co. · State v. Schwartzmiller · State v. Kerekes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith .... [but] may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Balfour · State v. Smith“'[Tjo be classified as a common plan or scheme it is not necessary for the erimes to have been perpetrated in an absolutely identical manner, so long as the court perceives a visual connection between the ... crimes.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hildreth · State v. Lamb“'whether evidence of the other crime would have been admissible in a separate trial”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.