Wilson v. McMahon’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1998
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Inter-Mountain Threading, Inc. v. Baker Hughes Tubular Services, Inc. · Cody v. Atkins · Carey v. Jackson · Erickson v. Magill · Colwell v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e undertake a full review of the record without deference to the views of the trial court. In determining whether a JNOV motion should be granted, we consider “whether the evidence is such that without weighing the credibility of the witnesses, or otherwise considering the weight of the evidence, there can be but one conclusion reasonable persons could have reached_” Erickson v. Magill, 713 P.2d 1182, 1186 (Wyo.1986). In our review we consider the evidence favorable to the nonmoving party, giving it all reasonable inferences. A court should cautiously and sparingly grant JNOV motions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““I. Whether the jury’s verdict was overwhelmingly against the weight of the evidence. “II. Whether the District Court erred in considering ordering a new trial on damages. “HI. Whether the District Court erred in granting the summary judgment and not allowing amendment of the complaint concerning Appellant’s claims for intentional interference with contract and business relationships and bad faith.” Appellee words them: “A. Whether the District Court erred in granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict. “B. Whether the District Court erred in conditionally granting a new trial. “C. Whether the District Court erred in granting summary judgment on claims where no material issue of fact existed or in not allowing the decided claims to be raised a second time by an amendment of the complaint shortly before trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.