Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

831 So. 2d 1280

West v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 18, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-12-18

Relies on 616 So. 2d 991 - Boomer v. State · 648 So. 2d 1259 - Smith v. State

Decided 2002-12-18

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm appellant’s convictions for first degree murder, robbery with a deadly weapon, and attempted felony murder, but reverse the sentence imposed on the attempted felony murder conviction.

¶2Appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment without eligibility for parole, with a three-year mandatory minimum term, on Count I, first degree murder. As to Count II, robbery with a firearm, appellant was sentenced to serve fourteen years in prison, concurrent with the sentence imposed *1281on Count I. As to Count III, attempted felony murder, appellant was sentenced to serve fourteen years, consecutive to the sentences imposed on Counts I and II.

¶3Appellant argues that the trial judge erred in denying his motion to correct sentence because the consecutive fourteen-year terms for Counts II and III total twenty-eight years, which exceed the guideline range (8.45 years to 14.08 years) without a supporting valid reason for departure. We agree and remand this cause with directions to resentence appellant as to Count III within the guideline range. See Smith v. State, 648 So.2d 1259 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)(holding that while it was proper to order the non-capital felony sentences to run consecutive to the capital sentence, citing Boomer v. State, 616 So.2d 991 (Fla.1993), it was improper to impose consecutive life sentences for the non-capital convictions which exceeded the guideline range).

POLEN, C.J., FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
/831/so2d/1280 · .json · Public domain