831 So. 2d 214 - Cunningham v. Appel’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 575 So. 2d 630 - State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. KAW · 483 So. 2d 505 - GEN. ACC. v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. · 431 So. 2d 627 - Boyles v. Mid-Florida Television Corp. · 467 So. 2d 282 - Mid-Florida Television Corp. v. Boyles · 742 So. 2d 451 - Hoch v. Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[d]isqualification of a party's chosen counsel is an extraordinary remedy and should be granted sparingly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.