831 So. 2d 484 - Cancienne v. Cancienne’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 389 So. 2d 1277 - Revere v. Revere · Schroth v. Schroth · Broadway v. Broadway · 588 So. 2d 795 - Tabuchi v. Lingo · 661 So. 2d 665 - Lopez v. Lopez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the mother did not provide Mr. Cancienne with formal notice of the move, as set forth in LSA-R.S. 9:355.5, it is undisputed that Mr. Cancienne was aware of the move, even if he did not believe that it was permanent. If Mr. Cancienne had objected to the move in September of 1998, when the move took place and when Louisiana was the home state of the child, the parties could have litigated the issues regarding the move at that time in a Louisiana court. However, Mr. Cancienne did not object to the move until his child had lived in another jurisdiction for approximately one and one-half years. Considering the record before us, we find that Alabama is the home state of the child. 9”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.