831 So. 2d 585 - Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State · Heidel v. State · 705 So. 2d 307 - Holland v. State · 644 So. 2d 451 - Moody v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While a comment by a single prospective juror during voir dire may taint the entire panel, where there is no evidence of such a taint, the court may correctly refuse to disqualify the entire panel from service if the jury affirms that it can render a verdict based solely on the evidence brought before the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.