¶1Affirmed. See Novaton v. State, 634 So.2d 607 (Fla.1994); Hubbard v. State, 662 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (holding that a negotiated sentence precludes appeal or collateral challenge of conviction and sentence on double jeopardy grounds apart from an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel); see also Hurlburt v. State, 807 So.2d 687 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (holding that habitual offender sentences are not affected by the unconstitutionality of the 1995 sentencing guidelines); Hepburn v. State, 778 So.2d 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
831 So. 2d 691
DeLoach v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 16, 2002
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-10-16
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2004
1 state decisions
Relies on 634 So. 2d 607 - Novaton v. State · Hubbard v. State · Hepburn v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-10-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →