831 So. 2d 808 - Evans v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Trial Courts of the Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases · 585 So. 2d 282 - Amado v. State · Matter of Use by Tr. Cts. of Stand. Jury Inst. · Chastine v. Broome · Bozeman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he trial judge serves as the neutral arbiter in the proceedings and must not enter the fray by giving `tips' to either side.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Rule 3.510. Determination of Attempts and Lesser Included Offenses On an indictment or information on which the defendant is to be tried for any offense the jury may convict the defendant of: (a) an attempt to commit the offense if such attempt is an offense and is supported by the evidence. The judge shall not instruct the jury if there is no evidence to support the attempt and the only evidence proves a completed offense;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.