¶1We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence as we find any claimed error on the challenged evidentiary rulings to be invited and/or harmless. See Czubak v. State, 570 So.2d 925, 928 (Fla.1990)(under invited error doctrine, party may not make or invite error and then take advantage of error on appeal); Phillips v. State, 739 So.2d 632, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(eviden-tiary issues were subject to harmless error analysis and not reversible when they did not affect the verdict).
831 So. 2d 819
Comesana v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 11, 2002
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-12-11
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2005
1 state decisions
Relies on 570 So. 2d 925 - Czubak v. State · Phillips v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-12-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →