State Ex Rel. Mountjoy v. Bonacker’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2019
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Time, Inc. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc. · State v. Harmon · State Ex Rel. Wesolich v. Goeke · State v. Smith · Reproductive Health Services, Inc. v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Except as provided in Rule 32.06, a change of judge shall be ordered in any criminal proceeding upon the timely filing of a written application therefor by any party. The applicant need not allege or prove any reason for such change. The application need not be verified and may be signed by any party or an attorney for any party. (b) In felony and misdemeanor cases the application must be filed not later than ten days after the initial plea is entered. If the designation of the trial judge occurs more than ten days after the initial plea is entered, the application shall be filed within ten days of the designation of the trial judge or prior to commencement of any proceeding on the record, whichever is earlier. (c) A copy of the application and a notice of the time when it will be presented to the court shall be served on all parties. (d) Upon the presentation of a timely application for change of judge, the judge promptly shall sustain the application [[Image here]] Committee Note-1982 [[Image here]] The following application would be sufficient: “(Caption) . requests a change of judge. (Signature and address of attorney or party.)””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“assure fairness to litigants in exercising their privilege to disqualify a trial judge while, at the same time, avoiding undue delay in the proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Id. (internal quotation omitted). The purpose of Rule 32.07 is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.