United States v. Facchini’s Empirical Analysis
832 F.2d 1159 · 1987
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2016
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1919 · 26 U.S.C. § 3303 (Federal Unemployment Tax Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 3304 (Federal Unemployment Tax Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 901 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 501 (§ 301 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 503 (§ 303 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 48 U.S.C. § 1599
Relies on Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg · Figueroa v. United States · United States v. Gilliland · Bryson v. United States · United States v. Rodgers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We think the test is the intrinsic capabilities of the false statement itself, rather than the possibility of the actual attainment of its end as measured by collateral circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.