Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 832 F.2d 1167 - United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

832 F.2d 1167 · 1987

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
May 2015
most recently cited

34 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably United States v. Arias-Villanueva (1993), United States v. Sanchez-Mata (1991)

34 federal appellate ·

3101987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Pinkerton v. United States · Pereira v. United States · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he government need not prove that the defendant was aware of every detail of the impending crime, nor that he be present at, or personally participate in, committing the substantive crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Q]uantity alone may be sufficient for a jury to infer the intent to redistribute a controlled substance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to the extent that evidence of prior and subsequent negotiations and illicit transactions bears on the issue of a defendant's intent to [perpetrate] the specific criminal act charged in the indictment, such evidence can be used to convict a defendant....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.