Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 832 F.2d 1380 - Zola W. Rittenhouse v. Edward H. Mabry, Jr.

Zola W. Rittenhouse v. Edward H. Mabry, Jr.’s Empirical Analysis

832 F.2d 1380 · 1987

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Pagano v. Frank (1993), Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp. (1993)

12 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

3701987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall · Shaffer v. Heitner · Pennoyer v. Neff · Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any business or perform any character of work or service”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We have held that with respect to Mississippi's long-arm statute a tort occurs where and when the actual injury takes place, not at the place of the economic consequences of the injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “nonresident defendant protests the exercise of personal jurisdiction, the burden falls on the plaintiff to make a prima facie showing that personal jurisdiction exists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.