Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Local 54 v. Read’s Empirical Analysis
832 F.2d 263 · 1987
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2017
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 431 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Steffel v. Thompson · Roberts v. United States Jaycees · Grayned v. City of Rockford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders Int'l Union, Local 54 v. Read, 832 F.2d 263 , 265 (3d Cir.1987) (citing Roberts v. United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609 , 622, 104 S.Ct. 3244, 82 L.Ed.2d 462 (1984) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brennan v. Norton“[I]mplicit in the right to engage in activities protected by the First Amendment [is] a corresponding right to associate with others in pursuit of a wide variety of political, social [and] economic ... ends.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brennan v. Norton“presumably comes within the [First Amendment's] right to associate for expressive purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brennan v. Norton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.