Farries v. Stanadyne/Chicago Division’s Empirical Analysis
832 F.2d 374 · 1987
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 136 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Heller Financial, Inc. v. Midwhey Powder Co. (1989), Beam v. IPCO Corp. (1988)
22 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 2021 · 38 U.S.C. § 2022
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Costello v. United States · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Trammel v. United States · Dewees v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
31 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although a district court certainly should give notice to the parties when the court converts a 12(b)(6) motion into a motion for summary judgment, the failure to do so does not necessarily mandate reversal where nothing else could have been raised to alter the entry of summary judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.