Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 832 F.2d 81 - Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. v. Local Union No. 1, Bakery, Confectionery & Tobacco Workers' International Union

Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. v. Local Union No. 1, Bakery, Confectionery & Tobacco Workers' International Union’s Empirical Analysis

832 F.2d 81 · 1987

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
3
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Coca-Cola Bottling Company of St Louis v. Teamsters Local Union No (1992), Franklin Electric Co. v. International Union, United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (1989)

19 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

16019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · Bibby v. United States · Kelly v. Robinson · Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “terminated in the event she [was] absent, for any reason whatsoever including illness, more than one day per month for the first six months following her reinstatement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “based his award on a policy outside the letter agreement”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Nevertheless, an arbitrator is confined to interpretation and application of the collective bargaining agreement; he does not sit to dispense his own brand of industrial justice. He may of course look for guidance from many sources, yet his award is legitimate only so long as it draws its essence from the collective bargaining agreement. When the arbitrator’s words manifest an infidelity to this obligation, courts have no choice but to refuse enforcement of the award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.