Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 832 F.2d 884 - Stevens v. Corbell

Stevens v. Corbell’s Empirical Analysis

832 F.2d 884 · 1987

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
July 2005
most recently cited

24 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2005 · most notably Valencia v. Wiggins (1993), Petta v. Rivera (1998)

24 federal appellate ·

160198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Estelle v. Gamble · Mitchell v. Forsyth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the state officer’s action caused severe injury, was grossly disproportionate to the need for action under the circumstances and was inspired by malice rather than merely careless or unwise excess of zeal so that it amounted to an abuse of official power that shocks the conscience, it should be redressed under Section 1983.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether force was applied in a good faith effort to maintain or restore discipline, or maliciously and sadistically for the very purpose of causing harm.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “at least in the prison security guard context, the 'Due Process clause affords no greater protection than does the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.