Jawad v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis
832 F.3d 364 · 2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 948B (§ 1802 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 10 U.S.C. § 948D (§ 1802 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 5031 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Russello v. United States · Keene Corp. v. United States · United States v. Stevens · United States v. Lovett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(alteration in original) (quoting Keene Corp. v. United States , 508 U.S. 200 , 208 [ 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 ] (1993) ). Furthermore,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.