United States v. Key’s Empirical Analysis
832 F.3d 837 · 2016
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
January 2020
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Miller v. California · Stanley v. Georgia · Ashcroft Attorney General v. Free Speech Coalition · Smith v. United States · United States v. Ristine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This court has held that when a defendant is convicted of an offense related to child pornography, a ban on the possession of pornography is 'appropriately tailored to serve [the] dual purposes of promoting [the defendant's] rehabilitation and protecting children from exploitation.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“can be sanctioned for violating this special condition of release, a court must find that he possessed material that is both obscene and deemed inappropriate by a probation officer or treatment staff.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“consistently rejected overbreadth arguments where the special condition at issue precluded the defendant from possessing pornography or sexually explicit material.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.