Edwards v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · Minnesota, v. Wayne Thomas Carter · Litchfield v. State · Moran v. State · Peterson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“judicial precedent, or court rule that is later declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalidated[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Meister v. State · State v. Harmon“Under the state of the law as it existed at the time of the search of the trash, this search was not unreasonable and the marijuana was properly discovered evidence. Consequently, according to L.C. § 35-37-4-5, the evidence could not have been properly excluded and could provide support for the finding of probable cause to issue the warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Eshelman v. State“court may not grant a motion to exclude evidence on the grounds that the search or seizure by which the evidence was obtained was unlawful if the evidence was obtained by a law enforcement officer in good faith”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Meister v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.