Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 832 NE2D 1108 - Outlaw v. Danks

Outlaw v. Danks’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lucas v. Frazee · 173 Ind. App. 300 - Arnold v. Parry · East v. Estate of East

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The testator, in the presence of two (2) or more attesting witnesses, shall signify to the witnesses that the instrument is the testator's will and either: (A) sign the will; (B) acknowledge the testator's signature already made; or (C) at the testator's direction and in the testator's presence have someone else sign the testator's name.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[[Image here]] (4) Take the acknowledgment of any person who is blind, without first reading the instrument to the blind person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “ample evidence that it was [the decedent's] intent to leave her property to [the defendant],”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.