People v. Holt’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 1997
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7202 · 26 U.S.C. § 7203
Relies on People v. Morley · People v. Bennett · Barber Pure Milk Co. v. Alabama State Milk Control Board · People v. Abelman · People v. Grenemyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) a lawyer engages in serious criminal conduct, a necessary element of which includes intentional interference with the administration of justice, false swearing, misrepresentation, fraud, extortion, misappropriation, or theft; or the sale, distribution or importation of controlled substances; or the intentional killing of another; or an attempt or conspiracy or solicitation of another to commit any of these offenses; or (b) a lawyer engages in any other intentional conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation that seriously adversely reflects on the lawyer’s fitness to practice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Stauffer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.