Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 832 So. 2d 1191 - State v. Cedars

832 So. 2d 1191 - State v. Cedars’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dorthey · California v. Civil Aeronautics Board · McKay v. Jobin · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato · Anchors v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he sentence for vehicular homicide is illegally lenient. The statute requires the imposition of a fine of not less than $2,000.00, nor more than $15,000.00, and also requires the court to order participation in a court-approved substance abuse program, driver improvement program, or both. The failure to assess Mr. Cedars with a fine and order him into a court-approved program provide... grounds for vacating the sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.