Bautista v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Melbourne v. State · 600 So. 2d 457 - The Florida Bar v. MacMillan · Grappin v. State · 462 So. 2d 813 - State v. Watts · Tillery v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“DOES THE "A/ANY" TEST ADOPTED IN GRAPPIN V. STATE AND STATE V. WATTS AS THE METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE UNIT OF PROSECUTION FOR THE COMMISSION OF MULTIPLE PROSCRIBED ACTS IN THE COURSE OF A SINGLE EPISODE, PRECLUDE MULTIPLE CONVICTIONS FOR DUI MANSLAUGHTER WHERE MORE THAN ONE DEATH OCCURS IN A SINGLE ACCIDENT AS APPROVED IN MELBOURNE V. STATE?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“3. The death of any human being commits DUI manslaughter .... Id. (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.