¶1AFFIRMED. Based on defendant’s numerous and successive meritless pro se filings, we hold that Mr. Moore is precluded from filing any additional pro se appeals, pleadings, motions or petitions relating to his conviction and - sentence in trial court case 05-1998-CF-004167-AXXX-XX, unless reviewed and signed by an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida. See Rahymes v. State, 730 So.2d 420, 422 (Fla. 5th DCA), cause dismissed, 733 So.2d 516 (Fla.1999); Davis v. State, 705 So.2d 133, 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409, 410-11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); see also Lockett v. State, 769 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).
832 So. 2d 249
Moore v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 6, 2002
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-12-06
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2018
4 state decisions
Relies on 652 So. 2d 409 - Isley v. State · 733 So. 2d 499 - Gomez v. Singletary · 705 So. 2d 133 - Davis v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-12-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →