MESC v. Culbertson’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 558 So. 2d 840 - United Cement v. Safe Air for the Env. · 749 So. 2d 1017 - Tillmon v. MISS. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH · Brame v. Wyatt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he employees' failure to exhaust their administrative remedies in the face of substantial evidence that the MESC did not follow the MSPB rules, will not destroy the jurisdiction of the EAB or an appellate court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[s]ubstantial evidence was presented that employees were discouraged from filing grievances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the `falsification' was not significant enough to require reversing the EAB's orders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.