Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 832 SO2D 875 - L.R. v. State

L.R. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 425 So. 2d 1191 - Taylor v. State · A.J. v. State · Massey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(4) If the court finds that the child named in the petition has committed a delinquent act or violation of law, it may, in its discretion, enter an order stating the facts upon which its finding is based but withholding adjudication of delinquency and placing the child in a probation program under the supervision of the department or under the supervision of any other person or agency specifically authorized and appointed by the court.... (5) If the court finds that the child named in a petition has committed a delinquent act or violation of law, but elects not to proceed under subsection (4), it shall incorporate that finding in an order of adjudication of delinquency entered in the case, briefly stating the facts upon which the finding is made, and the court shall thereafter have full authority under this chapter to deal with the child as adjudicated.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in circumstances where an adjudication is entered, the trial court must state briefly the facts upon which the adjudication was based.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.