Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 832 SO2D 89 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2001
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 640 So. 2d 1056 - Ex Parte Works · 814 So. 2d 1008 - Dupaquier v. State · 409 So. 2d 987 - Lawrence v. State · Jennings v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[PROSECUTOR]: What did you do in response to him asking for a lawyer? "[McEWIN]: He said that he want[ed] to call his attorney, Paul Phillips. And so I called him. Mr. Phillips came down to the office, spoke with [the appellant], and I then spoke with [the appellant] in the presence of Mr. Phillips.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 832 So. 2d 92 - Smith v. State
  2. “address the merits of the issue [the appellant] raised concerning the admission of the officer's testimony about [the appellant's] statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 832 So. 2d 92 - Smith v. State
  3. “[PROSECUTOR]: What did you do in response to him asking for a lawyer?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 832 So. 2d 92 - Smith v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.