Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

832 S.W.2d 26

Absher v. Absher

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1992

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1992-06-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2023

1 state decisions

Relies on Murphy v. Carron

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-06-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2This is an appeal from the trial court’s order awarding wife maintenance and attorney’s fees pendente lite in a dissolution case. The trial court’s order is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.banc 1976).

¶3An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principals of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

/832/sw2d/26 · .json · Public domain