LaRue v. LaRue’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2013
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 349th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Gulbenkian v. Penn · Collora v. Navarro · Zieben v. Platt · Houtchens v. Matthews · Pinnacle Homes Inc. v. R.C.L. Offshore Engineering Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e will not require a layman to continually attempt to monitor the progress of a court case, or hire a lawyer to do so, when the parties have done nothing to place him on notice of the reversal of their intentions, and every factor had demonstrated that the termination proceeding had been consummated.... Thus, until there was information available to Appellant that would have alerted him that his parental rights might not have been terminated, Appellant neither knew nor had the means of knowing that he should investigate the status of the adoption proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kawazoe v. Davila“1. a false representation or concealment of material facts, 2. made with knowledge, actual or constructive, of those facts, 3. to a party without knowledge, or the means of knowledge, of those facts, 4. with the intention that it should be acted on, and 5. the party to whom it was made must have relied or acted on it to his prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kawazoe v. Davila“the trial court's third conclusion of law pertaining to the unavailability of the estoppel defense in the instant [child support enforcement] case was erroneous”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Ces
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.