Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 832 SW2D 919 - Gardner v. Blahnik

Gardner v. Blahnik’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2015

6 state decisions

30199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bunting v. McDonnell Aircraft Corporation · Marshall v. Edlin · Vanderson v. Vanderson · Nichols v. Pendley · Earls v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The capacity of a party to sue means the party has the right to avail himself access to the courts because he is without any general disability (e.g., infancy or insanity).” Id.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.