Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

833 F.2d 1006

Docket No. 87-1165.

Wool v. Hinkel

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-11-25

Relies on Waterman v. Alta Verde Industries, Inc.

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1987-11-25

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, CHAPMAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Steve Wool, appellant pro se.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Wool v. Hinkel, C/A No. 87-1896-H (D.Md. Aug. 4, 1987).

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/833/f2d/1006 · .json · Public domain