Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 833 F.2d 1104 - Soler v. G. & U., Inc.

Soler v. G. & U., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 766 F. Supp. 177 - City of New York v. Exxon Corp. (1991), Soler v. G & U, INC. (1992)

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

1201987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 119 · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘relied on factors which Congress had not intended it to consider, entirely failed to consider an important aspect of the problem [or] offered an explanation for its decision that runs counter to the evidence before the agency, or is so implausible that it could not be ascribed to a difference in view or the product of agency expertise.’”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “by substantial evidence demonstrating that the housing is not a benefit running primarily to the employee, but rather a burden imposed upon the employee in furtherance of the employer's business.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “such as when an employer requires an employee to live on-site to meet a particular need of the employer, or when an employee is required to be 'on call' at the employer's behest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.