Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 833 F.2d 135 - United States v. Govro

United States v. Govro’s Empirical Analysis

833 F.2d 135 · 1987

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
April 1998
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 13 (Assimilative Crimes Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Abney v. United States · United States v. Jorn · Wade v. Hunter · United States v. Scott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The government may appeal in a criminal case under 18 U.S.C. § 3731 unless the Double Jeopardy Clause bars further prosecution. The Double Jeopardy Clause bars further prosecution when the court enters a judgment of acquittal and reversal necessitates a new trial. An acquittal based on a ruling that the government’s evidence is legally insufficient to sustain a conviction therefore may not be appealed. This is true even if the acquittal was entered for erroneous reasons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A defendant is acquitted and a government appeal barred ... when the judge's ruling, whatever its label, actually represents a resolution in defendant's favor, correct or not, of some or all of the factual elements of the charged offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.